Penlight Prize Offers $25,000 Award to FOIA Journalism Outside of Paywalls

I hear a lot about what’s broken in the economics of online journalism. It’s a topic that’s always coming up at SF happy hours I go to, maybe because so many of my friends are former journalists or passionate news readers. The concerns are real:

  • Online journalism isn’t bringing in money the way it used to, and even incredible, award-winning journalists are losing their jobs because of cutbacks.
  • Surveillance advertising, which props up many news websites, is creepy at best and predatory at worst.
  • Many news organizations can’t afford to invest in long-form investigative journalism. They’re optimizing for clicks, not work that might someday be cited in a congressional hearing.
  • Readers can’t afford subscriptions to every news site they visit, leaving some of the best journalism on the web locked behind paywalls.
  • And even talented journalists who survive the cuts are leaving the field for the relative stability and financial security of corporate marketing and PR jobs—especially as they think about raising families, buying homes, and putting money into a 401(k).

These are just a few of the headwinds facing modern online journalism. Solving the economics of it is going to take a fundamental shift not only in how we fund journalism but in how readers think about their relationship to the news. And that’s going to take years.

In the meantime, there’s a way to shift the needle on at least one corner of investigative journalism: FOIA based journalism.

The newly launched Penlight Prize is a $25,000 award for FOIA-based journalism published outside of paywalls.

Journalism based on Freedom of Information Act requests is a particularly meticulous, slow form of journalism. It requires journalists be creative, inquisitive, and above all tenacious. Journalists seeking government records may have to send in requests multiple times, may have to use the court system to fight for access to documents, and may wait years to get responses. When (or frankly if) documents are obtained, those documents are often unstructured, poorly formatted, and difficult to parse—say, thousands of pages all scanned as a single PDF. Making sense of them takes obsessive and careful parsing, sometimes over weeks.

It’s one of the most grueling forms of journalism, and therefore among the most expensive in terms of sheer human hours. Yet the information uncovered through public-records reporting can be extraordinarily important.

Unfortunately, the resulting journalism may still end up behind a paywall, where only a fraction of the public can read it.

Freedom of the Press Foundation has been encouraging news organizations to make FOIA-based journalism freely available so everyone can benefit from reporting based on public records. Now that encouragement comes with a compelling incentive.

I don’t have any illusions that the Penlight Prize can fix what’s wrong with modern journalism. But I do think it can meaningfully change one thing: whether FOIA journalism lives behind a paywall.

My hope is that, in the coming years, publishing FOIA-based investigations outside the paywall becomes the default at news organizations across the country—even when the rest of the publication remains subscription-only.

The $25,000 award is designed to make that incentive meaningful for individual reporters. That is enough money to replace a failing car, cover a year of a child’s daycare in some places, or contribute substantially toward a down payment on a home.

And importantly, the prize goes directly to the journalist, not the publication.

It should serve as an incentive not only for that journalist to keep working on FOIA journalism and publishing outside of paywalls, but to entice other journalists who might be working in the field to work with their editors to get their articles outside of paywalls as well. If enough reporters start asking—and if publications see that paywall-free public-records reporting is something worth recognizing—we can begin to establish a new norm.

Importantly, taking FOIA journalism outside of a paywall doesn’t hurt publications. Wired did it—and their subscriptions increased. 

While online journalism is cutting positions and freezing salaries, the Penlight Prize is offering a massive incentive to investigative journalists to get their content outside of paywalls and into the public sphere.

Applications are open right now and close September 1, 2026.  Please help spread the word to journalists who might benefit. And if you’re an investigative journalist doing FOIA-based reporting, work with your editor to get your articles outside the paywall and apply.

Come to My Book Launch Events April 7 & 9

My new book, Transaction Denied, is going to be in bookstores across the country April 7. Come celebrate the launch, pick up a book, hang out, and talk about digital rights with me at two SF Bay Area events.

I know how much Bay Area folks loathe crossing the bridge—especially on a weekday—so I’m hosting an event on each side. Come to whichever one is closer.

EAST BAY

Tuesday April 7, 2026
7 PM
Mrs. Dalloway’s Bookstore
 2904 College Ave, Berkeley, CA 94705
Space is limited. Please RSVP and try to arrive at 6:45 (the bathroom closes at 6:30 PM, so plan accordingly).
RSVP here.

SAN FRANCISCO

Thursday April 9, 2026
7 PM
City Lights Books
261 Columbus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94133
(Parking at North Beach Garage works pretty well if you drive.)
RSVP here.
Space is limited. Please RSVP and try to arrive by 6:45 PM. Some of us will go next door to Vesuvio for drinks after.

Can’t be there in person? No worries—the San Francisco event at City Lights will be livestreamed. RSVP to watch on Zoom.

I will be joined at both events by Cyrus Farivar, an award-winning author, editor, and investigative tech journalist with 20+ years of experience. He is also the author of multiple books, including Habeas Data (2018) and The Internet of Elsewhere (2011). Cyrus has written for Forbes, NBC News, Ars Technica, NPR, The Economist, Wired, and many others.

You can pick up the book at the launch, if you haven’t already pre-ordered it. (Though pre-orders are the single best way to help a brand new author like me.)

About the book:

Weaving together over a decade of research with interviews and narratives from those personally impacted by financial censorship, Transaction Denied reveals how financial exclusion has become a tool to pressure marginalized voices into silence.

From the executive director of a voting rights nonprofit to a teacher of Iranian poetry, to adult content creators and the cannabis community, the book uplifts the voices of those who have been targeted by these powerful institutions. Their stories are a launching point for exploring larger issues about who should have the power to censor in a democratic society.

A portion of every book sale goes to support Freedom of the Press Foundation.

Transaction Denied Now Available for Pre-Order

My new book, Transaction Denied: Big Finance’s Power to Punish Speech, is available for pre-order today.

Here are three ways to order:

1. Use this link to order from Bookshop.org and a portion of the proceeds will go to support an amazing bookstore in Stratford, CT called Obodo Serendipity Books.

2. Order from Amazon.

3. Order from Barnes and Noble.

You can also contact your local bookstore to get a copy on order.

Regardless of where you order the book from, a portion of the book sales will go to benefit the nonprofit Freedom of the Press Foundation.

Pre-ordering books is one of best ways to support an author. Strong pre-sales lead to more promotional opportunities, more book events, more media interest, and then more book sales. This becomes a flywheel effect: the more attention your book gets early on, the more opportunities it has to get attention later. So please pre-order the book on any platform you would like. There will be an audiobook at launch, too.

Transaction Denied delves into a key issue that has gotten a lot of attention lately: what does it mean to have a financial system that is not speech neutral? I talk about how financial companies have byzantine terms that give them vast power to cut off the accounts of speakers on a whim. And, it’s not those in power who are losing access to the financial system. Those who are otherwise denied power in our society suffer the most from this sort of censorship.

The book is full interviews with people who lost their financial accounts because of otherwise legal speech. Between those stories, I talk about the laws, regulations, and corporate policies that created this system, and some of the key court battles that have left us in a state where financial companies have so much power to punish disfavored speakers.

The more I worked on the book, the more I realized this wasn’t just a book about speech and money—it’s about democracy. It’s about whether financial corporations should have the right to control which speakers are punished, and it’s about who can freely participate in our society. And those choices impact all of us.

Please pre-order today and please share the word on social media. If you’re interested in hosting a book event (in person or on Zoom), please let me know.

The Revolutionary Class

Note: this is a short fiction story I published in Evocations in January 2022. I was thinking about the impact of the gig economy on the body, and specifically on women’s bodies, and I was also thinking about hypocrisy I’ve seen among men who count themselves as revolutionaries and feminists. I was also thinking about the power of friendship, and about how uncertain and hungry those first years after college can feel. I wanted to poke gentle fun and be a little humorous, but also be real about loneliness and despair.

The Revolutionary Class

The same month I gave birth, my roommate quit her internship at the art gallery to become a hypnotherapist. “There is just more opportunity for career growth,” she told me. We were occupying the uncertain eddy of life after graduation, living on top of each other in the smallest studio apartment in Santa Cruz. During the day, we tried to make money scraping paint and pulling weeds on TaskRabbit. In the evenings, she hypnotized me. She wanted the practice, she said. And hadn’t she proofread my entire dissertation, though she had no interest in Trotskyism?

Continue reading “The Revolutionary Class”

Toilet paper, Tampons, and Phone Calls: Affording Prison in California

An interview with a recently released prisoner on the financial burdens associated with imprisonment

KT was incarcerated in California for one year over charges related to fraud. She is a friend of mine, but I did not find out she was in prison until she had served more than half of her sentence. When I learned she was incarcerated, I reached out to her family to offer support and began visiting her every week for her last couple months in prison. She was held in Dublin FCI, just a few miles from my house but very far from her home in Southern California.

In communicating with KT, I was struck by the huge impact of prison costs on not just KT’s life, but on her whole family. Seemingly small expenses in prison mounted and became burdensome for her wife and eventually created major rifts between family members, with ramifications that continued after KT left prison.

This interview was conducted 19 days after KT was released in early December, 2017.

Continue reading “Toilet paper, Tampons, and Phone Calls: Affording Prison in California”

Thinking about ledes

If your opening sucks, it doesn’t matter what else you say.

That was the theme for a writing workshop I hosted this week at EFF, with some help from the ever-amazing Danny O’Brien.

If your opening sucks, it doesn’t matter what else you say.

That was the theme for a writing workshop I hosted this week at EFF,  with some help from the ever-amazing Danny O’Brien.

We gathered a group of about 10 folks to discuss ledes on Friday afternoon. For the first 20-30 minutes, we talked about the philosophy of ledes and walked through several articles that demonstrated different approaches. I also created a handy worksheet (copied below in case anybody wants to steal it).

After walking through the basics, I passed out a few paragraphs from a complicated, very technical article and asked people to write the headline and first few sentences. Everybody had to write at least two ledes, then pair up and share them with a partner. Afterwards, we got back together as a group and shared a few.

This is the second time I’ve led a writing workshop specifically focused on ledes, and I personally thought it was a blast. I loved the fact that people actually brought pens, wrote something down, and shared it with the group. So often, writing workshops are about thinking, analyzing, and providing feedback, and that accesses the analytic parts of the brain without engaging the creative side. But there’s something a bit magical and even silly about taking pen to paper and creating something on the spot. And then getting to hear what people wrote—unpolished, a bit messy—is also really exciting for me. I am amazed at the ideas people come up with, and I also love the practice of working creatively and then sharing fearlessly in a welcoming environment.

While we didn’t have enough time for it Friday, I think creativity inspires creativity. One or two people who are willing to think outside the box and then share their writing can inspire others to want to do the same. So ideally, I’d like to do this workshop with enough time to do two rounds of free writing.

The main result of the workshop, I hope, is simply mindfulness. The next time someone from the group sits down to write a blog post, they’ll hopefully remember how vital those first few lines are and then give themselves permission to take a few risks.

My workshop handout:

Ledes are Awesome!

What is it?

  • Title
  • Subtitle
  • First couple lines (see examples)

Imagine that you are a director. Your lede is the opening shot in the movie.

What’s the purpose?

  • Convince people to click on the article
    • Intriguing
    • Relatable
    • Alarming
    • Funny
    • Fascinating
    • A topic you care about a lot
  • Convince people to keep reading after the first sentence
  • (Sometimes) Convey all the important stuff in an article, so people get the main gist even if they stop reading
  • Sets the tone for the rest of the article

Why should I care?

In some ways, the lede matters more than any other section in your article. If you don’t get it right, it doesn’t matter what you say later because people won’t click on your article or will abandon it before they get far along.

Also, some people will only EVER see the lede (e.g. skimming Google News results)

Strategies for the process of writing ledes:

  • Write several different ledes (both title and intro text); don’t just go with your first idea.
  • Don’t phone it in.
  • Get creative in a few drafts (you don’t have to use a creative idea, but it helps to get you thinking outside the box to write a few!). Remember: nobody sees your shitty first drafts.
  • Remember: there is no one single “right” way to write a lede!

Some ideas to try:

  • Assertions that may seem unlikely.
  • Narrative moments
  • Powerful quotes
  • A summary of the article—but only if it is a truly amazing summary!
  • A particularly intriguing fact or figure
  • A relatable human

Some things you might want to try to avoid in your lede:

  • A bunch of acronyms
  • Specific names of cases, bills and laws
  • Trying to cram all the details into the first sentence
  • “Last week” and other dated time references
  • Too many facts and figures can be bad (though one really scary fact or figure can be great)
  • A bunch of links